Framing gender identity registration amidst national and international developments: Introduction to ‘Bodies, identities, and gender regimes: Human rights and legal aspects of gender identity registration’


  • C L Quinan
  • Verena Molitor
  • Marjolein van den Brink
  • Tatiana Zimenkova



Introduction to ‘Bodies, identities, and gender regimes: Human rights and legal aspects of gender identity registration’


Amelina, A & Lutz, H 2019, Gender and Migration: Transnational and intersectional prospects. Routledge, New York.

Anthias, F 1998, ‘Rethinking social divisions: Some notes towards a theoretical framework’, Sociological Review 46, no. 3, pp. 505-535.

Baars, G 2019, ‘Queer Cases Unmake Gendered Law, Or, Fucking Law’s Gendering Function’, Australian Feminist Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 15-62.

Bennett, T 2015, Cuts and criminality: Body alteration in legal discourse. Routledge, New York.

BMJV (Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz) 2017, Arbeitskreis Abstammungsrecht. Abschlussbericht. Empfehlungen für eine Reform des Abstammungsrechts, Bundesanzeiger Verlag, Köln.

Buschner, A & Bergold, P 2017, ‘Regenbogenfamilien in Deutschland’, in Bergold, P, Buschner, A, Mayer-Lewis, B, Mühling, T (eds.), Familien mit multipler Elternschaft. Entstehungszusammenhänge, Herausforderungen und Potenziale. Verlag Barbara Budrich, Berlin, pp. 143-172.

Butler, J 1993, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex.’ Routledge, New York.

Butler, J 1999, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, New York.

Butler, J 2004, Undoing Gender. Routledge, New York.

Cho, S, Crenshaw, KW & McCall, L (eds.) 2013, Intersectionality: Theorizing power, empowering theory (special issue), Signs, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 785-1055.

Clarke, J.A. 2015, ‘Identity and Form’, California Law Review, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 747-839.

Clarke, J.A. 2019, ‘They, them, and theirs’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 894-991.

Cooper, D 2019, ‘A very binary drama: The conceptual struggle for gender’s future’, feminists@law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-36.

Cooper, D & Renz, F 2016, ‘If the state decertified gender, what might happen to its meaning and value?’ Journal of Law and Society, vol. 43, pp. 483-505.

Crenshaw, K 1989, ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 1391–1467.

Crenshaw, K 1991, ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,’ Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241-1299.

Davis, DA 2017, ‘The Normativity of Recognition: Non-Binary Gender Markers in Australian Law and Policy’, in Demos, V & Segal, MT (eds.), Gender panic, gender policy: Advances in gender research. Emerald Publishing, Bingley, pp. 227–50.

De Silva, N 2019, ‘Individual and NGO access to the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The latest Blow from Tanzania’ [blog], EJIL Talk, last accessed 9 June 2020,

Erikson, EH 1968, Identity: Youth and crisis. Faber & Faber, London.

FRA: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights 2020, A long way to go for LGBTI equality, EU, Luxembourg, last accessed 10 June 2020,

Franke, K 2015, Wedlocked: The perils of marriage equality. How African Americans and Gays mistakenly thought the right to marry would set them free. New York University Press, New York.

Fredman, S 2016, Intersectional discrimination in EU gender equality and non-discrimination law, European Commission, DG for Justice and Consumers, Directorate D – Equality, Unit JUST/DI, Brussels.

Gamson, J 1995, ‘Must identity movements self-destruct?: A queer dilemma’, Social Problems, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 390-407.

Gerards, J 2018, ‘Margin of appreciation and incrementalism in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 495–515.

Giddens, A 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Grabham, E 2007, ‘Citizen bodies, intersex citizenship.’ Sexualities vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 29-48.

Hines, S 2009, ‘A pathway to diversity?: Human rights, citizenship and the politics of transgender’, Contemporary Politics, vol. 15, no. 1: 87-102.

Holtmaat, R 2004, Towards Different Law and Public Policy The significance of Article 5a CEDAW for the elimination of structural gender discrimination [Research undertaken for the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment in the Netherlands], last accessed 10 June 2020,

Holzer, L 2018, Non-Binary Gender Registration Models in Europe. Report on third gender marker or no gender marker options. ILGA-Europe, last accessed 13 June 2020,

Inter-American Court of Human Rights 2017, Opinión Consultiva OC-24/17 de 24 de noviembre de 2017 solicitada por la república de costa rica identidad de género, e igualdad y no discriminación a parejas del mismo sexo obligaciones estatales en relación con el cambio de nombre, la identidad de género, y los derechos derivados de un vínculo entre parejas del mismo sexo (interpretación y alcance de los artículos 1.1, 3, 7, 11.2, 13, 17, 18 y 24, en relación con el artículo 1 de la convención americana sobre derechos humanos), last accessed 10 June 2020,

International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) 2012, ‘A Review of the Requirement to Display the Holder’s Gender on Travel Documents.’ TAG/MRTD/21-IP/4.

Katyal, SK 2017, ‘The Numerus Clausus of Sex’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 84, pp. 389-494.

Mak, G 2012, Doubting Sex: Inscriptions, Bodies and Selves in the Nineteenth-Century Hermaphrodite Case Histories. Manchester University Press, Manchester.

McLaughlin, J 2006, ‘The Return of the Material’, in Richardson, D, McLaughlin, J, & Casey, ME (eds.), Intersections between feminist and queer theory, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 59-77.

Mezey, SG 2019, Transgender Rights: From Obama to Trump. Routledge, New York.

Molitor V & Zimenkova T 2019, ‘Loyalität, Overperforming und aufgezwungene Expertise: LSBTQ* – Identitäten und Arbeitsalltag in der Polizei’, in Seeliger M, Gruhlich J (eds), Intersektionalität, Arbeit und Organisation. Arbeitsgesellschaft im Wandel. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim.

Monro, S & Van der Ros, J 2018, ‘Trans* and gender variant citizenship and the state in Norway’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 57–78.

Monro S 2019, ‘Non-binary and genderqueer: An overview of the field’, International Journal of Transgenderism, vol. 20, no. 2-3, pp. 126-131.

Nisar, AN 2018, ‘(Un)Becoming a man: Legal consciousness of the third gender category in Pakistan’, Gender and Society, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 59-81.

Otto, D 2015, ‘Queering gender [identity] in international law’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, vol. 33, no. 4, 299–318.

Polizeidienstvorschrift (PDV 300) ‘Ärztliche Beurteilung der Polizeidiensttauglichkeit und der Polizeidienstfähigkeit’ [Police service regulation (PDV 30)’ ‘Medical assessment of the suitability for police service and police service capabilty’], Runderlass des Ministeriums vom 7. 11. 2012 – P 25.41-12 504.1.12 (Nds. MBl. S. 1107)

Quinan, C 2017, ‘Gender (in)securities: Surveillance and transgender Bodies in a post-9/11 era of neoliberalism’, In Leese, M and Wittendorp, S (eds.), Security/Mobility: Politics of Movement. Manchester University Press, Manchester.

Quinan, CL & Bresser, N 2020, ‘Gender at the border: Global responses to gender diverse subjectivities and nonbinary registration practices.’ Global Perspectives, forthcoming.

Richardson, D 1998, ‘Sexuality and Citizenship’, Sociology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–100.

Richardson, D 2000, ‘Constructing sexual citizenship: Theorizing sexual rights.’ Critical Social Policy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 105–135.

Richardson, D 2015, ‘Neoliberalism, Citizenship and Activism’, in Paternotte, D, Trembley, M (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Lesbian and Gay Activism, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham.

Sabsay, L 2012, ‘The emergence of the other sexual citizen: orientalism and the modernisation of sexuality’, Citizenship Studies, vol. 16, nos. 1-2, pp. 605-623.

Spade, D 2008, ‘Documenting Gender’, Hastings Law Journal, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 731-842.

Spade, D 2011, Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. South End Press, Brooklyn.

Tajfel, H & Turner, JC 1986, ‘The social identity theory of intergroup behavior’. in Worchel, & Austin, WG (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall, Chicago.

van den Brink, M, & Dunne, P 2018, Trans and Intersex Equality Rights in Europe – A Comparative Analysis. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

van den Brink, M, Reuss, P & Tigchelaar, H 2015, ‘Out of the box? domestic and private international law aspects of gender registration: A comparative analysis of Germany and the Netherlands’, European Journal of Law Reform, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 282-293.

van den Brink, M & Tigchelaar, J 2015, M/V en verder. Sekseregistratie door de overheid en de juridische positie van transgenders. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag.

Verloo, M 2013, ‘Intersectional and Cross-Movement Politics and Policies: Reflections on Current Practices and Debates’, Signs, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 893-915.

Waites, M 2009, ‘Critique of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” in human rights discourse: global queer politics beyond the Yogyakarta Principles’, Contemporary Politics, vol. 15, no. 1: 137-156.

Wipfler, AJ 2016, ‘Identity crisis: The limitations of expanding government recognition of gender identity and the possibility of genderless identity documents’, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, vol. 39, pp. 491-555.