The Consequences of Acting Unlawfully

Authors

  • Kris Gledhill

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19164/ijmhcl.v1i10.144

Abstract

The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for detention and also for treatment which would otherwise be an assault. As such, it allows for interference with the fundamental rights to liberty and to self-determination. Particularly as it does so in the context of a branch of medicine which is often highly subjective, it is hardly surprising that litigation is occasionally resorted to by those affected who wish to challenge the legality of what is occurring to them.

The framework for this litigation has developed, spurred on in particular by the growth of public law and human rights law. As a result, mental health professionals have to be familiar not just with the court-machinery which is central to the Mental Health Act 1983 (which provides for the Mental Health Review Tribunal to determine the legality of the ongoing detention of a patient, and refers the issue of the displacement of a nearest relative to the county court) but also with the courts which deal with questions of public law (in particular the Administrative Court) and the civil litigation courts.

Author Biography

Kris Gledhill

Barrister, editor of Mental Health Law Reports and Prison Law Reports, lecturer

Downloads

Published

2014-09-04

Issue

Section

Articles and Comment