The Mental Capacity Act 2005, the Mental Health Act 1983, and the Common Law

Authors

  • Phil Fennell Cardiff Law School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19164/ijmhcl.v1i13.178

Abstract

This paper considers what has come to be known as the ‘interface’ between the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Health Act 1983. Until the 2005 Act comes into force in 2007, practitioners will have to be aware of the interface between powers to admit to institutional care and treat without consent under common law and those which exist under the Mental Health Act 1983.

In simple terms, the interface question is ‘When may the common law or, after 2007, the 2005 Act, be used to admit to institutional care and treat without consent, and when will use of the Mental Health Act be required?’ This article argues that there are two decisions of the European Court which need to be considered in determining how to bridge what has become the “Bournewood gap”: HL v United Kingdom and Storck v Germany. These will require that the State must provide effective supervisory mechanisms to ensure that mentally incapacitated people are not deprived of their liberty (Article 5) and do not have their right of bodily integrity interfered with (Article 8) without lawful authority.

Author Biography

Phil Fennell, Cardiff Law School

Professor of Law

Downloads

Published

2014-09-05

Issue

Section

Articles and Comment